Firstly, I don't claim this view of mine is in any way scientific. It cannot make predictions, be refuted, etc. It's just an interpretation of a model, not a m

Firstly, I don't claim this view of mine is in any way scientific. It cannot make predictions, be refuted, etc. It's just an interpretation of a model, not a model. Secondly, I am not claiming there is a causal effect going on remotely. I am claiming that the decision making process itself is a mechanism, and if it is identical to another, remote, decision making process, then whatever one decides, the other will decide too. Another way to view it, is that whatever caused A to decide X, will also cause identical B to decide X. Each of A and B believe they are deciding X independently, but in fact, both are identical and therefore not independent.