3 ms·
Would you care to elaborate on how they're a "very rich company"? (Edit: I actually read the article after my post and saw the section about Benchmark Capital'
by albeec13 13y ago
Would you care to elaborate on how they're a "very rich company"?
(Edit: I actually read the article after my post and saw the section about Benchmark Capital's $13 million investment. The rest of my comments still stand...)
Now if you meant they have built such a large following that a buyout is inevitable, and/or they stand to make a lot of money by introducing a business model into the equation, then I'd agree. However, that does not change the fact that the owners are incredibly greedy not to accept a $3 billion cash offer, especially considering the fact that there's no guarantee they can come up with a viable business model at all. Now that they've turned down an arguably hugely inflated offer, they may have made a huge mistake in the long run.
Let's not forget that Snapchat isn't exactly a difficult product to clone, and the only thing going for them right now is user numbers. If they introduce a poor money-making mechanism into it, users will not hesitate to flock to the "next big thing" instead of forking over cash or dealing with intrusive ads.
- 001sky 13y agothat does not change the fact that the owners are incredibly greedy not to accept a $3 billion cash offer Hard-nosed seems like a better term. In many cases indistinguishable by obserbation, but Greed is both pejorative and moralizing. Absent special knowledge of the principals state of mind, its use also seem presumptory.
- chrislipa 13y ago>the owners are incredibly greedy not to accept a $3 billion cash offer You can look at this another way -- Maybe greedy would be taking the life-changing amount of money here, and they're not because they actually like their jobs.