4 ms·
since all Bitcoin transactions are public and pseudonymity given by opaque addresses is our ONLY financial privacy protection, services like this should be cons
by vinchuco 13y ago
since all Bitcoin transactions are public and pseudonymity given by opaque addresses is our ONLY financial privacy protection, services like this should be considered a direct and malicious attack on Bitcoin system.
- icecreampain 13y agoOr they're just a bunch of people trying to make a buck which, unfortunately, makes the world go round. If they manage to establish themselves as LE's provider of Bitcoin info, then they're got a monopoly and a guaranteed income for the rest of their lives.
- VMG 13y agoI agree. Good thing that Bitcoin flourishes from malicious attacks, otherwise it would have been dead a long ago or would die soon.
- sliverstorm 13y agoThe information is all there, and all public, right from the start. This is no more an attack on Bitcoin, than taking wood from beneath a "Free Wood" sign is theft.