4 ms·
Relevant to the conversation, but these were very recently released: http://www.beatsbydre.com/headphones/studio-wireless/beats-studio-wireless.html http://www
by bmelton 13y ago
Relevant to the conversation, but these were very recently released:
http://www.beatsbydre.com/headphones/studio-wireless/beats-studio-wireless.html http://www.beatsbydre.com/headphones/studio-wireless/beats-s...
I don't generally endorse products that I consider to be overpriced, but 1) I have no experience with them, so I can't say that they are or aren't, and 2) the list of features is quite impressive (12 hours battery, bluetooth, headset controls, and supposedly fantastic quality sound).
- frigg 13y agoOh come on, beats, seriously? If you don't have any idea of the quality/price ratio then why post them? They are horribly overpriced.
- bmelton 13y agoBecause they're continually reviewed as being good quality? Because the author said that price is no object? Because the new model is wireless? Because the new model looks less like a toy and more like something people might wear? By most accounts, the quality is there, and with the feature set, they don't appear to be that overpriced. Or at least, not so much so when compared to its nearest competition. I qualified my lack of first-hand experience, so I don't feel remotely guilty about the suggestion. Why does it offend you so much? Why do you feel yourself to be the arbiter of what's worthwhile and not?