11 ms·
Not anymore. They were later released under the Apache 2 license. http://aspnetwebstack.codeplex.com/license http://aspnetwebstack.codeplex.com/license http:/
by adolfojp 13y ago
Not anymore. They were later released under the Apache 2 license.
http://aspnetwebstack.codeplex.com/license http://aspnetwebstack.codeplex.com/license
http://entityframework.codeplex.com/license http://entityframework.codeplex.com/license
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2012/03/27/asp-net-mvc-web-api-razor-and-open-source.aspx http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2012/03/27/asp-net-mv...
I suggest updating your comment.
- thatthatis 13y agoThe current license linked at http://www.nuget.org/packages/EntityFramework/ http://www.nuget.org/packages/EntityFramework/ is the one I commented about. I'm glad to see they're moving more of these technologies over to truly FOSS. Which pieces are on which license if you get it from which place? I'll update the linked comment with that blog post -- I seriously scoured the other press release and couldn't find which license these were released under.
- knocte 13y agoYou guys are talking about different things. The licences of the projects (EntityFramework, ASP.NET) are opensource, but the licence only applies to the sources. Nuget packages, however, are binary. And they might have a different licence. So to avoid the latter, you just need to compile the sources yourself instead of using the Nuget packages. EDIT: actually, the last paragraph is not true anymore, thanks to this: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2013/11/13/pcl-and-net-nuget-libraries-are-now-enabled-for-xamarin.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2013/11/13/pcl-and-ne...
- thatthatis 13y agoI think we can all agree, how these are licensed is currently confusing.