4 ms·
I don't think the intention was to imply "everything is equal". I think the intention was closer to "everything has a cost" or "you can't simultaneously optimiz
by Double_Cast 13y ago
I don't think the intention was to imply "everything is equal". I think the intention was closer to "everything has a cost" or "you can't simultaneously optimize for everything". AKA the Project Management Triangle.
- protonfish 13y agoI realize what they were trying to say and I agree with it; they just stated it poorly. Is it that hard to not use the word "everything?" I suppose it does not make as good of a headline. If you are going to give advice, you need to consider how your advice can be misused. There exists techniques and technologies that are measurably superior to others. Knowing how to recognize them is a critical skill for a competent developer.