4 ms·
It's not maximalist to say that a website cannot make a copy of something for someone who owns the item in another form. That right to copy belongs to the copy
by wildgift 13y ago
It's not maximalist to say that a website cannot make a copy of something for someone who owns the item in another form. That right to copy belongs to the copyright owner, not the person who owns a copy.
- Amadou 13y agoFor argument's sake let's say you are right, that it is not maximalist. That would imply there is a more extreme interpretation that would qualify as maximalist. Can you describe what that interpretation might be? What is more extreme than saying without exception that the "right to copy belongs to the copyright owner, not the person who owns a copy." Meanwhile, I'll just leave this right here: http://www.ripshark.com/ http://www.ripshark.com/