4 ms·
As has previously been noted, this is a poor article. It compares a default Drupal install against a finished (as finished as Gmail can be, considering they ke
by mattkevan 13y ago
As has previously been noted, this is a poor article.
It compares a default Drupal install against a finished (as finished as Gmail can be, considering they keep tampering with it) product.
I bet Gmail looked pretty janky before the front-end devs got hold of it too.
Thanks to Drupal's module-based architecture and the massive community around it there's few limits on what one can do with it - it's rare that a module doesn't already exist for what you want to achieve.
- snowwrestler 13y agoIt's not a poor article because most people who build Drupal sites do not bother to change the default editing interface. I've seen the node edit screen of Drupal sites built by some of the biggest, most successful Drupal shops, and they all looked like out of the box Drupal. Most still had the "promote to front page" checkbox, even though it did not do anything. This author (who is a huge Drupal proponent) is encouraging people to spend some design time and energy on the edit interface.