5 ms·
And you know what the funny thing is? Drupal's UI/UX is usually often vastly superior to most other popular content management systems. I've had the 'pleasure'
by kitsune_ 13y ago
And you know what the funny thing is? Drupal's UI/UX is usually often vastly superior to most other popular content management systems.
I've had the 'pleasure' of working with a variety of content management systems over the course of my career and Drupal is easy-peasy-lemon-squeezy. You wouldn't believe the shit that is out there, especially in the Enterprise world.
Edit: I mean, I hate PHP with a fiery passion and it would never be my language of choice for a project, but I'd still rather be forced to use Drupal and its clunky EAV-Design than abominations such as Typo3 (also PHP/Typoscript), Joomla (also PHP), DotNetNuke (holy crap, please kill me now, this must be the worst CMS of all time), LifeRay Portal (Java)...
- untothebreach 13y agoI have worked with DotNetNuke, and while I agree that it is horrible, I have to say that HP/Autonomy/Interwoven's Teamsite/Livesite CMS is hands-down the worst piece of software (note: 'piece of software', not just 'CMS') that I have ever used. When you consider that companies will spend 7 figures for that POS, it boggles the mind...
- girvo 13y agoI used some IBM CMS that was so bad I quit the job after two days. Of course, the fact that I was hired into a content management position when I applied for an entirely different one, and wasn't told until the day I rocked up didn't help matters.
- JVIDEL 13y agoWhen you consider that companies will spend 7 figures for that POS, it boggles the mind... Yes awful..... so exactly which companies are paying upwards of a million for this? I just got an idea for a startup, I call it it Terrib.ly All customer support by Roy Trenneman
- niutech 13y agoHave you tried ProcessWire? It's lightweight and as flexible as Drupal, with a simple jQuery-like API.