7 ms·
Samsung, Nokia say they don’t know how to track a powered-down phone
- chatman 13y agoAs long as we have non free software running on their phones, it would be hard to believe the claim as is.
- nl 13y agoWhy? It's quite possible to check if a phone is transmitting, without even opening it. Additionally, it is usually possible to see what parts of a device are consuming power (or at least have current).
- chatman 13y agoThough, it might not be transmitting all the time when off. Imagine a schedule when a switched off phone transmits once a day, at a random time. Although it is not impossible to record such transmissions, it isn't quite simple.
- joosters 13y agoIt doesn't need to transmit. Perhaps it is just listening and recording signals from cell towers, wifi, gps etc? When the phone is turned 'back' on by the user, it could then transmit these at will.
- beagle3 13y agoSpread spectrum, if done properly ands below noise level, is virtually undetectable - especially if he noiselevel is dynamically measured, rather than just modeled.
- andyjohnson0 13y ago"Back in July 2013, The Washington Post reported that nearly a decade ago, the National Security Agency developed a new technique that allowed spooks to “find cellphones even when they were turned off." Since this technique pre-dates smartphones, it is unlikely to involve installing software on the phone. At best, the NSA might have found that a given model of phone didn't properly power-down its radio when the phone was powered-down. Given access to the cellular network it might be possible to ping the phone and make it disclose its position via triangulation. Very hard to see how this could be anything other than deliberate disinformation by the NSA though.
- Zigurd 13y agoA remote command capability was revealed in the trial of a mob boss. The FBI used a non-smartphone as a room bug. A reasonable surmise is that the phone can be commanded to periodically power on and listen for commands. Those commands could include turning on the speakerphone, jacking up the agc, and auto-answering without indicating the phone is on. Turning on periodically so it can be tracked would be one part of what it takes to implement a room bug.
- revelation 13y agoThey are probably not even lying that the baseband processor is shut down by the application processor, as it controls the power and system clocks. But the dirty little secret is that the baseband processor is still a completely uncontrolled subsystem, loaded with some propietary binary blob by trustworthy companies like Qualcomm. GPS and even the microphones are usually integrated into the baseband, not part of the application processor that runs your Android. So you have a perfectly capable ARM processor running a propietary RTOS system, written completely in C (or C++ occasionally) with access to all the vital periphery and a gigantic attack surface in dealing with all the mobile communication protocols. The only reason there hasn't been a complete breakdown yet is that it's difficult for amateur researchers to exploit, you need expensive RF hardware and the mobile communication protocols are huge bodies of closed committee designed standards. But it is without a doubt in the reach of the NSA, and they are probably actively exploiting baseband processors already. (Interestingly, since baseband processor have grown in complexity, most smartphones can now update the firmware on them, so there are lots of firmware images floating around. I highly recommend just even running strings on them, its quite enlightening. Some examples from a Nexus 4 radio: Failed do spoof USB cable disconnection Assertion os_mutex_pool_ptr[mutex_index_in_pool].is_available == 0 failed hsu_al_ser_open: hsu_al_ser_base_open for port NMEA (%d) returned failure Conversion to UTF-16 failed! Returned %d, expected %d Unexpected IP family %d - assuming IPv4 inflate 1.2.3 Copyright 1995-2005 Mark Adler Received ARP Request CxM - Received WLAN Early Grant Release (Yes, these are format strings! And this device has all the good stuff: classic 2005 zlib, a homebrew network stack, homebrew character conversion routines, homebrew operating system, homebrew USB stack...)
- brokenparser 13y agoThe only proper way to turn off a phone is to remove the battery, in lieu of nuking it from orbit (just to be sure).
- lotsofcows 13y agoBut is that the only battery? Is there a battery or cap powering the clock for example? Can that be corrupted?
- synergy-ek 13y agoApple knows, they should ask them. Fortunately, we can pull out battery from samsung phone.
- zaroth 13y agoThere's tracking a phone while it's off, and then there's realtime tracking of a phone while it's off. Two very different things, and two very different attacks. "a new NSA technique enabled the agency to find cellphones even when they were turned off" The current administration is very careful with choosing their words. I haven't seen WP's source, but I wonder if this is more about the phone blipping its receivers to record some local MAC addresses and scrambling codes and then uploading the data the next time the phone's powered on. You know when the word "collect" doesn't mean what you think it does, I wouldn't bet on nailing the word "find". :-)
- kojoru 13y agoMy Sony Ericsson K310i used to discharge in a week when turned off with a SIM-card present and only lose 5% in a month when turned off with SIM-card removed. At the time I thought it was due to poor power management, but now it really makes me wonder.
- lotsofcows 13y agoAre NFC enabled 'phones both NFC devices and NFC readers or just NFC readers? If they start adding RFID tags to 'phones, the only safe way to not be tracked will be not to carry the 'phone.
- jol 13y agohow about Faraday cage for your phone?
- tmzt 13y agoIn some devices the NFC transceiver is part of the battery, assuming it has it's own CPU and firmware it could be easily exploited to be trackable from relatively large distances. Other "near field" devices have, such as payment cards and passpoets, have been successfulyy communicated with or exploited using directional antennas from further away than you might think.
- philliphaydon 13y agoPersonally I've never understood why with every single Laptop and Mobile I've ever owned (where I could remove the battery) if I turned off the device, with full battery, eventually the battery dies... Yet if I power off the same device, take the battery out and leave it for the same amount of time, then put it back and power it on, its a full battery... On the same note, my iPhone 4, 15" Mac Book Pro w/ Retina, and Lumia 925, all when turned off completely, eventually the batteries die... Just slower than if they were turned on...
- RBerenguel 13y agoJust guessing, but a battery inside a computer/phone, even if turned off is probably still powering at the very least a few wires. Even if they don't go anywhere (i.e. they are not connected anywhere else) they probably are slowly eating away the battery. On the other hand, I don't know how modern computers/phones turn off, but I doubt they involve a full circuit cut (i.e. there is no big red button making a click sound and closing all wires coming out of the battery)
- Billkd 13y agoFrom what i found with my phone, I would like to confirm that even if phone is turned off, power is still supplied to few wires. When i remove battery from my phone and then put it back and turn it on, it would ask me to configure date settings. But if I just turn the phone off and then turn it on, it doesn't prompt me to configure date settings. so I can tell that at least the clock on my phone uses battery even when the phone is turned off.
- csmuk 13y agoTwo reasons: 1. Battery leakage. You can't charge a battery and leave it somewhere disconnected and expect to come back to a full charge. Small amounts of power leak all the time. Look for "self discharge". There are lines of batteries (particularly Sanyo Enelopp) that are marketed as low self discharge i.e. they can be stored charged and will still be usable in time. There is still a high resistance when something is connected which is enough to help with self discharge. 2. Most phones have a non mechanical on/off switch so a tiny bit of current is still used to have soft on/off functionality and watchdog circuitry online.
- ismail 13y agoone of the ways that coiuld be used to track feature phoned while they were switched on however was sending specially crafted messages sent to the phone that would force a location update which you can use to grab the cell id, and basically determine movement once you have a few of them.
- rlpb 13y agoIf I were tasked to implement this, I would arrange for the phone to appear to be powered down when in fact is is not, and for malware to do this when shutting down from inside the normal OS. If you "powered off" from software (by shutting down from a menu or holding the power down until the screen goes blank, but not the many seconds it takes to trigger a more hardware-level hard power off), then I would make the screen go blank and make all other inputs unresponsive, except for the normal power on input. For bonus points, I would arrange for the baseband to transmit only very minimally as necessary, so it isn't noisily detectable from RF pickups such as nearby speakers. The technical details would get simplified, and management would hear that I can track a "powered-down" phone.
- dobbsbob 13y agoThat's exactly what FinFisher police spyware does: pretends to shut off your phone but the mic is still recording
- femto 13y agoIf there's any sort of oscillator still running in the phone, or any other circuit switching with a predictable pattern of rising/falling edges, you'd think it might be possible to pick up EM radiation with a sensitive enough receiver/antenna. A bit more "out there", maybe it is possible to pick up a powered down antenna? Think that an antenna is a (typically passive) conductor, designed to resonate at a particular frequency. If the antenna is irradiated with that frequency, wouldn't the antenna couple to the field and disturb it is some way? If those disturbances can be measured, then the antenna (and consequently the phone) can be detected.
- Wingman4l7 13y agoSounds like you're describing The Thing[1]. It might work -- but then how could you tell cellphones apart? [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thing_%28listening_device%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thing_%28listening_device%29
- tudorconstantin 13y agoThe tracking might refer to listening to conversations that takes place near a shut down phone. The technique might be similar to the one used in laser microphones (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_microphone http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_microphone), but instead of measuring vibrations, to measure the electro magnetic field variance of phone's microphone.
- doctorstupid 13y agoWhy is it that when flying, we are sometimes requested to put phones into flight mode before switching them off?
- 46Bit 13y agoAt a guess it might be so that if you turn it back on during flight it's already in airplane mode?
- doctorstupid 13y agoGood thinking.
- Theodores 13y agoThanks to Snowden we know the NSA backdoor crypto code and have leverage over the telcos to get the help they need. We also know that solutions are plausibly deniable as far as the big name companies that we know about. So the same thng could go on here. If I had to put this in place I would get something that worked even if there were no cellphone masts in the area. Get the radio to listen to something entirely different, broadcast from some box that could be put in a car or in one of those electronic listening planes the military have. Have it work at the radio level on the phone so the cpu does not need to be used. The reply could be an entirely different identifier to the IMEA or SIM identifier with it being a simple database 'select' to get these codes.
- einehexe 13y agoNever go outside without a large hat. Switch vehicles at underpasses or car parks. Don't forget the milk.
- joosters 13y agoI wonder how a hypothetical 'bugged' phone would do the data transmissions? I used to have a phone on a contract that had excessively high data charges. As a result, I only used it for voice / SMS. If a bug had been planted on it, and it used normal IP networking, it would be obvious when I got my bill. I wonder if there are ways that a pwned phone could transmit to an attacker without hitting the billing system? Non-billed SMS? Or are there other techniques on GSM? (e.g. network operator updates get pushed to phones and they aren't billed; there must be some other low-level two-way messaging capabilities)