> It's not clear yet that what they did is illegal. This may or may not be the fact, due only to surreptitious, insidious manipulations of legislation. But ho

> It's not clear yet that what they did is illegal. This may or may not be the fact, due only to surreptitious, insidious manipulations of legislation. But how about we try immoral, unconscionable, and unconstitutional? When Congress asked James Clapper really tough questions, to which he gave untruthful answers, is that because Congress thought the NSA was acting in accordance with the law? Did Clapper give untruthful answers because he thought the NSA was acting in accordance with the law? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Clapper#False_testimony_to_Congress_on_NSA_surveillance_programs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Clapper#False_testimony_t...