In the state of Wisconsin, numerous stories point to Governor Walker's staff vetting hires based on their political activity. For example, withdrawing a candid

In the state of Wisconsin, numerous stories point to Governor Walker's staff vetting hires based on their political activity. For example, withdrawing a candidate they proposed for a governance position with the University of Wisconsin because they subsequently learned he had signed the recall position (for the sake of a family member and their job; the candidate is actually a staunch Walker supporter, himself). (This being my and many others' determination based upon detailed accounting of the story, despite subsequent PR spin to the contrary.) It's widely suspected that Governor Walker has ambitions for a 2016 run for the Presidency. Or maybe 2020. One has to wonder what such an Administration might get up to with respect to surveillance results feeding bias. "Conservative" or "Liberal". I don't want that power in either hands.