3 ms·

Two things, do you really think that most most people will think a fixubuntu site is a official ubuntu site? Does he in any way profit from the site? The secon

• chc 13y ago
  > Two things, do you really think that most most people will think a fixubuntu site is a official ubuntu site? Most? Probably not. But I think the potential is there for many to do so. > The second thing, did you read my link about fair use? I think this pretty much falls into it. Yes, but as you have not explained why you think it applies here, I don't know what you expect me to get from that link. I have already explained why this use does not seem clearly nominative to me†, and he certainly wasn't using the term "ubuntu" in a generic sense. † For starters, using the Ubuntu logo as the site's logo seems extremely superfluous. Do you believe visitors to the site will now have trouble telling what Ubuntu is since the logo has been removed?
  • msh 13y ago
    It is this part i find especially relevant: A nonowner may also use a trademark nominatively—to refer to the actual trademarked product or its source. In addition to protecting product criticism and analysis