4 ms·
I think a root problem here is a lack of understanding of the modern nature of information. Nobody fully understands it yet, but here is an example of some that
by pirateking 13y ago
I think a root problem here is a lack of understanding of the modern nature of information. Nobody fully understands it yet, but here is an example of some that are less aware of its properties (users of Snapchat) and something that is obfuscating it further (Snapchat).
Encryption does not fully seal the analog hole, at best it is suitable for protecting structured groups of bits until they must be prepared for crossing the analog gate.
The only way to have exclusive control of any analog or digital property is to exclusively own all access vectors to it. Any form of communication that is not neuron-based removes this lock by necessity, permitting various external channels and receivers access.
Share freely or share nothing - possibly not just a zealous philosophy, also a honest reflection of reality.
- callum85 13y agoI use Snapchat, and loads of my friends use it. I have never met a single Snapchat user who is under the false impression that there is any guarantee that their messages will be deleted. The 'self-destruct' feature is just a fun twist on picture messaging; nobody would rely on it for securing sensitive info! Have a bit more faith in people's intelligence. All this hand-wringing is by non-Snapchat users who have read about the app in the media and completely misunderstood what it is for. It's just for sending funny pictures to your friends, not for sending PIN numbers or secret mission briefings.