6 ms·
There is no CSS without HTML. And, there is no HTML without CSS as browsers contain built in style sheets.
by code_duck 13y ago
There is no CSS without HTML.
And, there is no HTML without CSS as browsers contain built in style sheets.
- boomlinde 13y ago> there is no HTML without CSS * HTML 2.0: 1995 * CSS 1: 1996 That must have been a hard year for HTML 2.0, not to mention half a decade for HTML altogether.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- code_duck 13y agoYes, things were definitely different 17 years ago.
- mrtbld 13y agoYou're right. I know that CSS needs to be applied to a document; without a document there's nothing to be styled. Still, to me saying that something is in "pure" CSS would imply that the HTML is not more complicated than e.g.: <div id=homer></div> (I guess that making a drawing such as the ones in the OP using only one div would not be possible until browsers accept pseudo-elements to be defined on top of other pseudo-elements.) I understand that by "pure" the author meant "without using images". But IMHO using dozens of empty div elements isn't "pure" CSS.
- code_duck 13y agoI see what you mean. Saying CSS/HTML would be a more precise way of describing this.