3 ms·
It takes a very long time for your body to go into "starvation mode." Intermittent fasting is actually a reasonably effective dieting technique assuming you don
by Nav_Panel 13y ago
It takes a very long time for your body to go into "starvation mode." Intermittent fasting is actually a reasonably effective dieting technique assuming you don't binge eat afterward to "make up the difference."
Good source: http://www.leangains.com/2010/10/top-ten-fasting-myths-debunked.html http://www.leangains.com/2010/10/top-ten-fasting-myths-debun...
> Looking at the numerous studies I've read, the earliest evidence for lowered metabolic rate in response to fasting occurred after 60 hours[0] (-8% in resting metabolic rate). Other studies show metabolic rate is not impacted until 72-96 hours have passed (George Cahill has contributed a lot on this topic).
> Seemingly paradoxical, metabolic rate is actually increased in short-term fasting. For some concrete numbers, studies have shown an increase of 3.6% - 10% after 36-48 hours[1,2].
[0]: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3661473 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3661473
[1]: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2405717 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2405717
[2]: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10837292 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10837292
- superuser2 13y agoParent seems to be talking about long-term permanent strategy, not sub-72-hour increments. I apologize if that was incorrect.
- graeme 13y agoI said I don't eat until 12. A 16 hour fast, typically.