3 ms·
Hearing to what problems a technology failed to solve is usually even more interesting. It cuts the hype.
by _random_ 13y ago
Hearing to what problems a technology failed to solve is usually even more interesting. It cuts the hype.
- kamakazizuru 13y agosure - but that's not the original question. Maybe the OP is just curious to understand some in production use cases (and the approach to their implementation) - and isn't that interested to know the edge cases where it doesn't work.
- _random_ 13y agoMaybe his case is an edge case.
- kamakazizuru 13y agoright - but then he would've framed the question as "what are the cases where mapreduce really doesn't make sense".