32 ms·

There are two types of social networks: the ones that everyone complains about, and the ones that no one uses.

kbar13 13y ago
google+ kinda sucks in that Google's trying way too hard to push everyone into it, but I actually prefer it to Facebook, if not only because the design is cleaner and I don't see as many duckface pics on my feed each day.
- k-mcgrady 13y ago
  >> "I don't see as many duckface pics on my feed each day." That's your problem for friending those people, not the networks for showing you what you explicitly asked for (not duckface pics but posts from those people).
  - grannyg00se 13y ago
    These things develop a culture though. The same friends you have on facebook may behave completely differently on a different platform.
    - KyeRussell 13y ago
      Nope.
  - jethro_tell 13y ago
    Kinda. I have dozens of cousins with terrible politics and duck faces that I love to hang out with 2 or 3 times per year. things that get organized on Facebook. It's tough to have only digital friends that don't do duck face or push shitty politics if you also have real life friends.
    - k-mcgrady 13y ago
      I'd suggest Facebook's hide button. I have several family members I need to use Facebook to keep in touch with but they post things I have no interest in seeing. Those two clicks to hide their posts really improved me FB experience. I think it's something Facebook should make more obvious because it would improve the experience for a lot of people - particularly those with lots of 'friends' they've only met a few times or don't want to delete because of the social stigma attached.
- jcx9x9 13y ago
  ..second problem may be the choice of friends?..just jokin..;)
- nextstep 13y ago
  I bet if google tries hard enough, Google+ can be both complained about my everyone AND barely used (in any real way which a user would consider "use").
  - deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]
  - _delirium 13y ago
    I feel that way about LinkedIn. My use of it consists exclusively of clicking "accept" on connection requests. I'm not sure I've ever used it for anything else, though presumably someone must.
- frostmatthew 13y ago
  > I don't see as many duckface pics on my feed each day And what makes you think if as many of your Facebook friends were on Google+ (and used it as actively) you still wouldn't see "as many duckface pics" in your feed?
- _mulder_ 13y ago
  That's because Facebook is the current home of the duckface crowd. Were the same people to start using Google+, you might see more duckfaces in your news feed! Having said that, I am more confident Google would address the problem and come up with a better method of filtering duckfaces that facebook. Whether they let you toggle the 'duckface filter' feature is another issue.
- enraged_camel 13y ago
  >>and I don't see as many duckface pics on my feed each day. Yet.
abus 13y ago
Google+: complained about and no one uses.
alextingle 13y ago
Except Google+ - which does both.

google+ kinda sucks in that Google's trying way too hard to push everyone into it, but I actually prefer it to Facebook, if not only because the design is cleaner and I don't see as many duckface pics on my feed each day.

k-mcgrady 13y ago
>> "I don't see as many duckface pics on my feed each day." That's your problem for friending those people, not the networks for showing you what you explicitly asked for (not duckface pics but posts from those people).
- grannyg00se 13y ago
  These things develop a culture though. The same friends you have on facebook may behave completely differently on a different platform.
  - KyeRussell 13y ago
    Nope.
- jethro_tell 13y ago
  Kinda. I have dozens of cousins with terrible politics and duck faces that I love to hang out with 2 or 3 times per year. things that get organized on Facebook. It's tough to have only digital friends that don't do duck face or push shitty politics if you also have real life friends.
  - k-mcgrady 13y ago
    I'd suggest Facebook's hide button. I have several family members I need to use Facebook to keep in touch with but they post things I have no interest in seeing. Those two clicks to hide their posts really improved me FB experience. I think it's something Facebook should make more obvious because it would improve the experience for a lot of people - particularly those with lots of 'friends' they've only met a few times or don't want to delete because of the social stigma attached.
jcx9x9 13y ago
..second problem may be the choice of friends?..just jokin..;)
nextstep 13y ago
I bet if google tries hard enough, Google+ can be both complained about my everyone AND barely used (in any real way which a user would consider "use").
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
- _delirium 13y ago
  I feel that way about LinkedIn. My use of it consists exclusively of clicking "accept" on connection requests. I'm not sure I've ever used it for anything else, though presumably someone must.
frostmatthew 13y ago
> I don't see as many duckface pics on my feed each day And what makes you think if as many of your Facebook friends were on Google+ (and used it as actively) you still wouldn't see "as many duckface pics" in your feed?
_mulder_ 13y ago
That's because Facebook is the current home of the duckface crowd. Were the same people to start using Google+, you might see more duckfaces in your news feed! Having said that, I am more confident Google would address the problem and come up with a better method of filtering duckfaces that facebook. Whether they let you toggle the 'duckface filter' feature is another issue.
enraged_camel 13y ago
>>and I don't see as many duckface pics on my feed each day. Yet.

abus 13y ago

Google+: complained about and no one uses.

alextingle 13y ago

Except Google+ - which does both.