3 ms·
It seems like a lot of this comes down to simple confusion of how to identify individuals who have been broadly known more publicly under one self-identificatio
by jdmitch 13y ago
It seems like a lot of this comes down to simple confusion of how to identify individuals who have been broadly known more publicly under one self-identification which they no longer identify with. Most people came to know about Manning under the original name, just as I came to know about Prince as "Prince" and not [Unpronounceable Love Symbol]. Confusion, convenience and ignorance does not amount to "virulent hatred" in my book, and it is unfortunate that Manning is not consistently identified with her preferred self-identification, but Wikipedia is an empirical indication of how your average person would identify her, and isn't a claim to "correctness." In time it will reflect the changing awareness of Manning's identity as it is brought to the attention of the public more broadly.
- ben0x539 13y ago"virulent hatred" is, imo, clearly visible in a lot of comments that argue against respecting Manning's gender identity. And beyond that it's concerning that the Wikipedia bureaucracy seems more interested in silencing people who know what they're talking about than in dealing with editors spouting hateful slurs and preaching nonsense that goes against accepted medical consensus on transgender issues.