4 ms·
Your attempt at a rationalization is logically flawed to the point of embarrassment.
by sjwright 13y ago
Your attempt at a rationalization is logically flawed to the point of embarrassment.
- hristov 13y agoIf you think there is a logical flaw in my argument say what it is. If you do not feel like saying what it is, then do not post. You must be very proud of yourself for composing a sentence with several big words in it, but it means absolutely nothing.
- sjwright 13y agoThe logical flaw is that you assume that all studies are worthy of consideration, and the hidden inference that equal weight should be given to a study regardless of its methodology or rigor. Good information generally cancels out bad information. I have no particular opinion about the veracity of any MSG claim, but there have been so many bad dietary studies published. I would urge a skeptical default position on any result, and only moderate skepticism based on evidence of sample size, methodology and rigor.