"These corporate interests you talk about, you do realize that (usually) about 20%-40% of stock owned by regular people and/or employees...." So, presumably th

"These corporate interests you talk about, you do realize that (usually) about 20%-40% of stock owned by regular people and/or employees...." So, presumably then acting in a questionable manner is fine because lots of "little" people make money from it. There for, if we assume such people understand that their money comes from such practices, they must there for approve? Ok, so, if it is so important that this corruption exists and it makes the "little man" money, then why is it such a secret? Or are we saying if fine to break laws or act in a shady way, as long as people make money? I'm sorry, I really don't understand the point of saying that regular people and employees own some stock. I don't see how that justifies or excuses questionable practice. Besides, if its benefiting one bunch of stock holders, it must be that another bunch are somewhere losing out.