> But the book never stated that the pussy flow was blocked in Denmark, just that there was low quality, masculine pussy. He sure isn't helping his case. All o

> But the book never stated that the pussy flow was blocked in Denmark, just that there was low quality, masculine pussy. He sure isn't helping his case. All of the random claims of "socialism" and "left-leaning" don't help, either. In fact, none of his clarifications actually prove she misquoted him, and each time he quoted his book in that post, it fit exactly with the original review. From his language (referring to women as "the pussy" instead of as, you know, actual people) to his extreme generalizations of women and cultures, it's apparent the original review was spot-on for both Roosh's book and PUA culture in general.