4 ms·
It just seems odd that you're reading Musk/Tesla-love, or an exclusion of the possibility of flaws, into my comments. It's like you're responding to someone els
by gojomo 13y ago
It just seems odd that you're reading Musk/Tesla-love, or an exclusion of the possibility of flaws, into my comments. It's like you're responding to someone else.
I'm mentioning another non-exclusive possibility... and one that would work synergistically to expand the stock impact of any actual flaws. (It becomes more likely once the initial idea is planted, be it by flaw or random coincidence. Turn 2 or 3 real fires into twice as many with a little help, collect a billion dollars.)
Or do you think high-flying volatile stock values are never unethically manipulated in either direction?
Hey, where were you during each of the fires so far?
- philwelch 13y agoI thought it was odd that you were positing conspiracy theories when they were not the Occam-optimal explanation. Musk worship is common around these parts so it seemed the more likely motivation for believing crazy conspiracy theories over more likely explanations.