3 ms·
so what the point of introducing a "private" access modifier that doesnt exist in javascript since one can still access privates? looks like pure politics withi
by camus2 13y ago
so what the point of introducing a "private" access modifier that doesnt exist in javascript since one can still access privates? looks like pure politics within google.
A breaking change like that shoved at the latest minute? you bet it is.
- btford 13y ago> shoved at the latest minute The pull request was opened 3 weeks ago with plenty of discussion.
- camus2 13y agowhy didnt you think about having this feature optional? class based controllers are optional yet,because of them you introduce a feature that affect function based controllers ?
- btford 13y ago> why didnt you think about having this feature optional? Opt-in security features aren't very useful. > class based controllers are optional yet,because of them you introduce a feature that affect function based controllers ? That's how competing constraints work out sometimes. We're always looking to improve though. The code is open source, so feel free to submit a PR or fork it if you disagree. :)
- thatthatis 13y ago3 weeks of discussion for a breaking change is "last minute" in my book