3 ms·
We've been using rc versions in production code too. As they've mentioned many times when they say unstable it doesn't mean that it was likely to break, simply
by santialbo 13y ago
We've been using rc versions in production code too. As they've mentioned many times when they say unstable it doesn't mean that it was likely to break, simply that they are free to change the API if they need too.
Does anyone know what's the rationale behind the separation of ngRoute? It's less than 4KB and less than 2KB when gzipped. I don't think it's worth the "pain" of having to remember to add another source file.
- Guillaume86 13y agoThey want to split in lot of optional modules, it's just the beginning. IMO it's a good idea. For your problem, perhaps they should add a custom build/download tool like jQueryUI.
- troyk 13y agoI think it's a great idea as well. Would like to see jqLite come out as well and be a separate project. Then those using jquery don't pay for jqLite, and even beter, for a quick landing page I'd be inclined to use jqLite naked for a nice tiny footprint.
- gyozaking 13y agoProbably because most projects will use uirouter: https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router
- lennel 13y agowhat is your build process? (angular noob here)but I would assume your dependency resolution takes care of this. (this sounds to me like build vs real issue)