3 ms·

I'm afraid I do not understand your comment as you seem to be echoing what I have stated.

• humanrebar 13y ago
  OK. Let me rephrase. Hopefully it will clarify. I'm saying ignoring behavior like the ones I mentioned for the sake of argument leads to fallacious reasoning with respect to the causes of (and probably the solutions to) poverty and inequality. You could chalk decisions up to DNA and brain chemistry, but at that point we're having a metaphysical argument. You could say that we should be considering trends in populations and not individual behavior but then we'd be having another philosophical discussion. Or maybe you agree with all that and I'm misunderstanding your point.