4 ms·
Well actually my whole second paragraph is about the purple :) The point of going from blue to white is to to visually convey that more pale colors mean 'closer
by roel_v 13y ago
Well actually my whole second paragraph is about the purple :) The point of going from blue to white is to to visually convey that more pale colors mean 'closer to the baseline'. I.e., pale blue is 'slightly better than baseline', pale red 'slightly worse than baseline'. If you were to blend from blue to purple, that wouldn't work any more. But if you leave in the white in the middle, it looks as if there are 'no data' spots. Hence, use variation in intensities for non-baseline, different color for baseline.
Cartography is not about conceptual consistency, it's about conveying information. I challenge you to make a map that conveys the message better than the choices made in the map in the OP (apart from subjective wah wah like 'blue is democrats' as was laughably brought up elsewhere in this thread).
- jader201 13y agoI sort of see that, but I don't understand why baseline (purple) needs to be set that much apart from slightly above (pink but almost white) or slightly below (blue but almost white), which are on completely different scales of color. Or maybe I just don't understand how cartography works, but something about that still seems off.