3 ms·
I found your comment somewhat cryptic, the asterisks mean it's affected, right? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729029 http://bugs.debian.org/
by eliasmacpherson 13y ago
I found your comment somewhat cryptic, the asterisks mean it's affected, right?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729029 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729029
"AES-GCM support was introduced in 6.2, so oldstable and stable should
be fine (from http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-6.2 http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-6.2):"
Debian 7 (wheezy) -- OpenSSH_6.0p1 Debian-4, OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013 (Supports AES-GCM)
If AES-GCM was introduced in 6.2, did someone patch 6.0 to support AES-GCM? I can't reconcile your list with the statement in the bug report otherwise. Could you explain?
I can't understand why AES-GCM was introduced in 6.2 and your list has many < 6.2 that support AES-GCM.
- JshWright 13y agoI _think_ he's talking about whether or not OpenSSL supports AES-GCM. e.g. Debian 7 has a version of OpenSSL that supports AES-GCM, but OpenSSH isn't one of the affected versions.