4 ms·
The problem are the conditions that make sweat-shops the least worst alternative for a lot of people. It's power, money and corruption. If the least worst alte
by skylan_q 13y ago
The problem are the conditions that make sweat-shops the least worst alternative for a lot of people. It's power, money and corruption.
If the least worst alternative is taken away from them, then they have only the next least worst alternative. Asking to take this away is asking to take away the best thing they have.
It's easy to write from a warm chair in a western country that people should have better job conditions considering the availability of jobs that allow for consumerism.
- nisa 13y agoI should have written that in a more neutral way. What I wanted to say is: Our corporations and our governments can and should be held partially responsible for these conditions. I'm not saying that it's only the fault of "evil corp" in the USA or any other western nation but saying it's their problem and sweat-shops are fine is in my opinion not the whole truth.