This is dangerous. The first reaction to such an endeavor is that it is GOOD. Not just good, but GOOD :-) But also, this is almost the textbook definition of "

This is dangerous. The first reaction to such an endeavor is that it is GOOD. Not just good, but GOOD :-) But also, this is almost the textbook definition of "the thin end of the wedge". I didn't really start thinking about this until I started reading the comments here on HN (awesome!) So wikipedia should be free. What else should be free? Who should pay? Someone needs to pay. Who should? Let's start grouping content on one side or another. This is a very, very bad idea. The answer, of course, is that it should all be free. Internet access should be a basic human right. It should be, it will be, it is only a matter of time. But until it is, an endeavor like this is subverting net neutrality, disguised as something good, and that is just a terrible idea.