Any article that attempts to lay down the truth about Unicode that does not mention UCS-2 is seriously deficient. There's way too many morons out there treatin

Any article that attempts to lay down the truth about Unicode that does not mention UCS-2 is seriously deficient. There's way too many morons out there treating UTF-16 input as UCS-2, or writing UCS-2 and calling it UTF-16 (or "Unicode" as the article nicely addresses). Both Windows and Java have fucked this up pervasively in the past.