> Edit: The parent comment, which was nearly half an hour old when I saw it, has been edited to remove the reference that I was against men's rights. My post h

> Edit: The parent comment, which was nearly half an hour old when I saw it, has been edited to remove the reference that I was against men's rights. My post had no replies when I edited. I removed that reference because I felt it sounded like I was accusing you of being against men's rights. That wasn't my intention. > Neither is there much of a recognition that while men have problems, it's not a competition and it doesn't mean that women don't also have problems. Definitely. However, when the solutions that third-wave feminists put forth further disadvantage men in areas like unemployment and education—or, to be more diplomatic, when someone passionate about men's rights feels that way—it's completely reasonable for them to respond with their objections. >The thing is that MRA, here on HN and most other places, are free to submit anything they want any time they want. Many people who passionately oppose third-wave feminist activism also oppose discussion of politics on HN, period. So they don't consider this to be a platform for their political views unless they're responding to activism already on the front page.