3 ms·
^^^That has to be a joke. Ditto. I was not talking about this particulate article( i should have added suffix s to article ), but just my opinion why some art
by deletes 13y ago
^^^That has to be a joke.
Ditto.
I was not talking about this particulate article( i should have added suffix s to article ), but just my opinion why some articles are quickly flagged of the site.
While I may be wrong on this one, it is still my honest opinion, and I would prefer less aggressive approach in my replyers.
- 001sky 13y agoJust to point out, the analysis I did above is the same anlaysis the Elon Musk did. It is using the same data. I just read his data source slightly more carefully. Then, the next step was just to reflect the news in this article. Nothing in what i just described contradicts your "opinion why some articles are quickly flagged of the site." The issue at hand is your premise is false. The article is a simple news story with a singular data point: what was (1) is now (3). We don't need to do any hand-wavy analysis. We just stick in these numbers and we have a pretty glaring inconsistency. Its not "a bias and falshood" because it uses the same framework (so no bias is added) with a single observed data point that nobody is debating (so no falshood).