3 ms·
Hungarian notation is not helpful at all especially when descriptive name could be used, IDE with rich intellisense, or just good code organization. Does anyone
by amaks 13y ago
Hungarian notation is not helpful at all especially when descriptive name could be used, IDE with rich intellisense, or just good code organization. Does anyone use hungarian notation besides Win32 APIs and Windows user level code (FWIW the NT kernel does not use Hungarian notation).
- strager 13y agoIn Haskell, I often suffix lists with 's' or 'es': f (x:xs) = ... g args = ... I also often prefix 'Maybe' types with 'm': mValue <- gets (Map.lookup key)
- mamcx 13y agoI have a use case that can't be helped at all by intellisense. If a object use a "server" or "remote" or their use requiere a LAN/WAN connection I put "srv", like: srvAccounts =... and if is a database then db* This always make clear this object can die because a connection problem...
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- pjmlp 13y ago> Does anyone use hungarian notation besides Win32 APIs and Windows user level code (FWIW the NT kernel does not use Hungarian notation). Microsoft nowadays advises against Hungarian notation, only allowing it for consistency within APIs that already use it. http://1code.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=All-In-One%20Code%20Framework%20Coding%20Standards&referringTitle=Documentation http://1code.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=All-In-One%20Code%2...