6 ms·
I think Mozilla may be headed in the same direction. Add-on File Registration System: http://www.ghacks.net/2013/11/01/mozillas-add-file-registration-system-se
by SudoNick 13y ago
I think Mozilla may be headed in the same direction.
Add-on File Registration System: http://www.ghacks.net/2013/11/01/mozillas-add-file-registration-system-serious-consequences-developers/ http://www.ghacks.net/2013/11/01/mozillas-add-file-registrat...
Merging of AMO with Firefox Marketplace: http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/26/thunderbird-seamonkey-kicked-mozilla-amo/ http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/26/thunderbird-seamonkey-kicke...
- jeorgun 13y agoIn Firefox's case, at least, it's clear that the only motive in doing so would be genuine concern for the safety of their users— Mozilla wouldn't have any incentive to stop people installing extensions that hurt their own business model.
- io45900 13y agoFirefox Marketplace is open source. It's based on Django and you can host your own. Source: https://github.com/mozilla/zamboni https://github.com/mozilla/zamboni
- kibwen 13y agoDoubtful. Mozilla has repeatedly gone out of their way to ensure that their services aren't strictly reliant on a centralized source. Firefox Sync allows you to set up your own sync server. Persona allows you to set up your own authentication server. Firefox OS allows you to set up your own first-class app store. Locking down Firefox add-ons in the same manner as Chrome would be highly out-of-character.