> assuming you have the same information Which you don't, since Goldman Sachs is always a few milliseconds ahead of everyone else. Given that almost everyone e

> assuming you have the same information Which you don't, since Goldman Sachs is always a few milliseconds ahead of everyone else. Given that almost everyone else out there is going to be trading on information that has already been consumed and acted upon by privileged parties, the markets may as well for all intents and purposes be irrational.