> which suggests that the author isn't interested in supporting Haskell's idiomatic concurrency model atop the JVM This is not quite true (I am the author). Ye

> which suggests that the author isn't interested in supporting Haskell's idiomatic concurrency model atop the JVM This is not quite true (I am the author). Yet I know my limits. Every contribution from the community is welcome, OTOH. The point of the blog posts was only to explore how far one can get with what Java has.