3 ms·
> Would be interesting to see how this performs relative to CAL, in terms of both speed and space. Indeed. Do you have some CAL installation somewhere to make
by voxfrege 13y ago
> Would be interesting to see how this performs relative to CAL, in terms of both speed and space.
Indeed. Do you have some CAL installation somewhere to make a comparison? (The links I find are all broken.)
- allertonm 13y agoUnfortunately it looks like you would have to build from source. The best place for that would be Rich Webster's fork - https://github.com/rdwebster/Open-Quark https://github.com/rdwebster/Open-Quark - which is the version maintained by Indicee.
- voxfrege 13y agoIn the "How to build..." document it says I need Eclipse exactly 3.3.0 I am not going to install this, even if I would find it somewhere, hence ....
- allertonm 13y agoI imagine the documentation is completely out of date. Anyway, if you don't want to look at it, that's your loss - while I don't think CAL has much of a future a lot of work was invested in it by a very talented team and there is probably something to be learned from it.
- voxfrege 13y ago> Anyway, if you don't want to look at it, that's your loss Actually, I did look into it several years back. If I remember correctly, CAL was not pure and still lazy. (An explosive combination, if you ask me.)