I see your point, but still doubt that Gavin intended his post as innuendo. My assessment is that he's not yet ready to respond to the paper with carefully wri

I see your point, but still doubt that Gavin intended his post as innuendo. My assessment is that he's not yet ready to respond to the paper with carefully written, fully-thought-out, detailed technical counter-arguments, but wanted to assuage the Bitcoin community and address all those "sensationalistic headlines" put forth by "reporters on deadline" with an 'official response' as soon as possible.