They definitely paint him as a narcissist. :-) I thought it was a fairly balanced portrayal. That said, nothing in the article convinced me that AOL wouldn't

They definitely paint him as a narcissist. :-) I thought it was a fairly balanced portrayal. That said, nothing in the article convinced me that AOL wouldn't have been better off just mining the AOL subscription revenue and paying it back to shareholders. (2 billion a year in 2008, still 800 million in 2012 according to their most recent 10K http://ir.aol.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=147895&p=irol-10k10q http://ir.aol.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=147895&p=irol-10k10q)