4 ms·
Or no number is interesting. The argument never proves the base case. ;)
by codeflo 13y ago
Or no number is interesting. The argument never proves the base case. ;)
- ithkuil 13y agoIf there was a number of interesting numbers, that number should include itself in the count, since we clearly have some interest in this topic. So if the number of interesting numbers is 0, then zero is an interesting number hence the number of interesting numbers is at least 1.
- mikeash 13y agoAlternately: if there are no interesting numbers, that fact is itself interesting. But that fact can be encoded as a number (see Gödel), and the number must be interesting if the fact is interesting. Thus there is at least one interesting number.
- galonk 13y agoThe fact being interesting doesn't mean its encoding is interesting. I might find a movie interesting but looking at the raw bytes of the MP4 file much less so ;)
- mikeash 13y agoDoes such a thing actually exist outside of the encoding used to represent it? Uh oh, I think we may have run into... PHILOSOPHY! http://xkcd.com/903/ http://xkcd.com/903/