Relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEVM6bM-fNs&feature=share&list=PLsRNoUx8w3rNKEUE5hk31sO5gr5x4LyP8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEVM6bM-fNs&feature=sh

Relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEVM6bM-fNs&feature=share&list=PLsRNoUx8w3rNKEUE5hk31sO5gr5x4LyP8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEVM6bM-fNs&feature=share&lis... As a Wittgensteinian (follower of L.W. on the way to P.M.S Hacker) I must simply reiterate: Brains do not behave, nor do they fail to behave; humans behave. Regardless of the neural correlates of developmental disorders, the behavior (map) is not a substratum (territory) – to reinforce this point, check out http://eyewire.org http://eyewire.org, where our judicious participation guides the mapping of the human brain, in a modular way (starting with the perceptual system). The perceptual system follows (eyes, e.g.) what we believe following entails. ("I believe X means nothing more or less than that I am disposed to behave in certain ways under certain conditions" – where "certainty" involves pre-theoretical commitments emergent by our own evolutionary tract.) The intensional-extensional domain distinction of the number theory is directly structurally relevant to the discussion of inside-outside (internal-external) behavior of neuroscience. Ultimately, "rules" are ordered, and some are self-organizing (like π): "autism creates itself", as A. Klin notes.