3 ms·
Try the Fibonacci sequence: 0.01, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.08, 0.13, 0.21 It generates a beautiful wave [1]. There's also this interesting property that you
by hcarvalhoalves 13y ago
Try the Fibonacci sequence:
0.01, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.08, 0.13, 0.21
It generates a beautiful wave [1].
There's also this interesting property that you can use any part of the sequence, and it will be the same wave [2].
[1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/89fg14dvsi3wuox/Captura%20de%20tela%202013-11-06%2020.20.29.png https://www.dropbox.com/s/89fg14dvsi3wuox/Captura%20de%20tel...
[2] https://www.dropbox.com/s/yu05xs10tauumgu/Captura%20de%20tela%202013-11-06%2020.32.30.png https://www.dropbox.com/s/yu05xs10tauumgu/Captura%20de%20tel...
- dnautics 13y agowhat phases did you use?
- hcarvalhoalves 13y agoAll in phase.
- kylebrown 13y agoHit enter in each parameter box to update it
- aadsam 13y agoWell, it won't be the exact same wave, but it approaches the same wave. It's because the ratio between consecutive numbers in the Fibonacci sequence approaches phi.
- zzleeper 13y agoNice findings! By the way, try the reverse sequence (0.21 .. 0.01). I find it much more calmed and the LHS graph looks quite beautiful