4 ms·
You're right, it looks like the capability was there before Microsoft bought Skype. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/new_details_on.html https://w
by pyrocat 13y ago
You're right, it looks like the capability was there before Microsoft bought Skype. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/new_details_on.html https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/new_details_o...
That's not to say they didn't help:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/microsoft-patents-voip-and-skype-wiretapping.asp http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/microsoft-patents-vo...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4254925 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4254925
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Microsoft-Ignores-PRISM-Claims-Dumps-P2P-and-Moves-Skype-Entirely-to-the-Cloud-389080.shtml http://news.softpedia.com/news/Microsoft-Ignores-PRISM-Claim...
- jsmeaton 13y agoRead the first comment of the yc link[0] > (1) Microsoft is a US Corporation > (2) With the Skype acquisition, Microsoft (arguably) becomes a telecommunications carrier. > (3) CALEA passed in 1994, "requiring telecommunications carriers and manufacturers of telecommunications equipment modify and design their equipment, facilities, and services to ensure they have built-in surveillance capabilities, allowing federal agencies to monitor all telephone, broadband internet, and VoIP traffic in real-time." Again, your original comment might be 100% accurate, but there's just no proof of that. Also, telecommunication companies are required to provide the means to intercept communications. I guess I'm just wary of comments and articles that make claims that can't be substantiated. It dilutes the value of correct (substantiated) information. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4254925 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4254925