4 ms·
That would make sense if you had a signed contract from Google that they were encrypting their internal traffic. I don't have that and I doubt anyone else does
by jonknee 13y ago
That would make sense if you had a signed contract from Google that they were encrypting their internal traffic. I don't have that and I doubt anyone else does either.
If the courts get involved it should 100% be at the hacking perpetrator, not to the victim.
- declan 13y agoSide note: Sec 702 of the FAA gives NSA complete immunity from all federal, state, and local laws, criminal prosecutions, and civil lawsuits when doing this kind of fiber tapping. "Notwithstanding" is an extremely powerful phrase. Wildcard. Trumps all other laws. (And this is why some of us were concerned about CISPA, which uses the identical language. Note CISPA's proponents have quietly faded into the woodwork post-Snowden revelations.)