3 ms·
The approach is interesting but the syntax makes it hard to use. Why not make the first arguments the types like one would expect?
by rimo 13y ago
The approach is interesting but the syntax makes it hard to use. Why not make the first arguments the types like one would expect?
- mneary 13y agoI went back and forth with that. I think I went with postfix because there exists another syntax which looks prefix: T([Number, Number])(function(x) { return x; }) For this method, a function type is defined and then serves as a constructor that accepts a function as argument.