3 ms·
I think you're absolutely right. We've actually been thought by Gmail not to remove messages but instead archive them and that's a good philosophy. I've been o
by pieterhg 13y ago
I think you're absolutely right. We've actually been thought by Gmail not to remove messages but instead archive them and that's a good philosophy.
I've been on Gmail since 2005 and have about 100,000 messages at 20 GB. There's messages coming in from 25 different addresses at 300/day with 100 being spam.
I don't feel like I'm an email power user though, I imagine people in sales do about 100x more than this.
It's definitely a requirement to be able to do this and I feel even if we would be outliers, in a couple of years we won't be anymore.
- tluyben2 13y agoAnd at least Google seems to think so; they worked with me to get my mail fast and working well. They asked me to turn stuff on and off, reroute addresses for a while and such until my mail (as it is now) was fast and solid. I think they do expect a lot of people to be like me in the future.