5 ms·
I always feel super lazy when I read these articles criticizing excessively long work weeks. Honestly, I think 40 hours is way too long, especially when the bul
by dmd149 13y ago
I always feel super lazy when I read these articles criticizing excessively long work weeks. Honestly, I think 40 hours is way too long, especially when the bulk of it is boring.
That being said, when you're working on something you enjoy and you get into that "flow" state, time becomes irrelevant. If something is fun and energizes you, you can do it without watching the clock, which the author does with his side projects.
If you work at a regular job and say you get into that flow state for 2 hour or so, when you're done, you realize, "shit, i have to be here for another 6 hours." Then you spend a lot of time dicking around on the internet/answering e-mails/doing non mentally taxing stuff. However, those 6 hours are actually pretty draining/depressing because you have to maintain the illusion that you're working + deal with the guilt that you're not being productive.
I dunno, maybe I'm just especially lazy and would like to spend as little time as possible working on things I don't enjoy.
- djKianoosh 13y agoa lot of comments here dance around the "quality" of hours. the "flow" state you describe is quality time. we all pretty much like that. on the flip side, if i'm at home 12 hours a day but my wife is in the other room and my child is watching tv while i'm on my phone checking twitter and hacker news... you get the point. all these numbers and thresholds are practically irrelevant. quality of time spent is key...