3 ms·
I'd argue it does. Deserve as mentioned in the parent implies some sort of generally accepted human 'right'. The length of the work day/ work week is fairly ar
by talkingquickly 13y ago
I'd argue it does. Deserve as mentioned in the parent implies some sort of generally accepted human 'right'.
The length of the work day/ work week is fairly arbitrary and definitely up for debate, there are great arguments that actually a three day working week would make far more sense [1].
Imo describing a simple convention in terms of deserve discourages debate and so should be avoided. Something broader such as `a human being deserves not to have to work every waking hour to live` would have been more acceptable as it separates the underlying principle from arbitrary conventions.
[1] http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/21-hours http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/21-hours