Thanks, looks like I'll have to brush up on my stats to analyze this further... But even without direct knowledge of how this works, shouldn't the "goodness" of

Thanks, looks like I'll have to brush up on my stats to analyze this further... But even without direct knowledge of how this works, shouldn't the "goodness" of the tests play a role in the numbers you're using? It doesn't seem to... > I thought you meant "at least two tests", for obvious reasons. Yes, sorry, I did, I guess you meant to say I should subtract 0.553542075 from 1 to get my answer. (just saw earl's post above...)